🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization established by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the state level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to copy this example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of the West, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of the Australian government and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.